<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To be, or not to be&#8230;.collective</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.albertsuch.com/blog/2007/01/15/to-be-or-not-to-becollective/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.albertsuch.com/blog/2007/01/15/to-be-or-not-to-becollective/</link>
	<description>Ideas, thoughts and rumblings about innovation and new technologies, and their interaction with people and places.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 19:28:12 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: People, places, technology, and such &#187; Revolt of the masses</title>
		<link>http://www.albertsuch.com/blog/2007/01/15/to-be-or-not-to-becollective/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>People, places, technology, and such &#187; Revolt of the masses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 11:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.albertsuch.com/blog/?p=5#comment-12</guid>
		<description>[...] Through one of the photography groups I participate in, I discovered this discussion about the good and evils of Flickr, amateur vs. professional photographers, and the supposed drop of quality caused by the access of the masses to digital photography technology. This is, in some sense, another example on the controversy around collective creation that I referred to in a previous pots. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Through one of the photography groups I participate in, I discovered this discussion about the good and evils of Flickr, amateur vs. professional photographers, and the supposed drop of quality caused by the access of the masses to digital photography technology. This is, in some sense, another example on the controversy around collective creation that I referred to in a previous pots. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
