<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>People, places, technology, and such &#187; standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.albertsuch.com/blog/tag/standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.albertsuch.com/blog</link>
	<description>Ideas, thoughts and rumblings about innovation and new technologies, and their interaction with people and places.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 11:37:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Color coding</title>
		<link>http://www.albertsuch.com/blog/2007/08/01/color-coding/</link>
		<comments>http://www.albertsuch.com/blog/2007/08/01/color-coding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 13:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>albert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.albertsuch.com/blog/?p=27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Using color is a typical way to differentiate between slightly different usages of otherwise similar artifacts. Be it garbage recycling containers in Barcelona&#8230;

&#8230; or mailboxes in Bangalore&#8230;

As widespread as it is the use of color coding, it remains quite a local thing in many occasions. The meaning and associations attributed to different colors varies a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: arial">Using color is a typical way to differentiate between slightly different usages of otherwise similar artifacts. Be it garbage recycling containers in Barcelona&#8230;</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/albertsuch/529312514/" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/231/529312514_0d684629c4.jpg" style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer" alt="Recycling colors" height="330" width="500" /></a><br />
&#8230; or mailboxes in Bangalore&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/albertsuch/951270189/" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1376/951270189_55b8a5f68d.jpg" style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer" alt="Mail colors, Ulsoor, Bangalore" height="307" width="500" /></a><br />
As widespread as it is the use of color coding, it remains quite a local thing in many occasions. The meaning and associations attributed to different colors varies a lot in different cultures and societies, so color codes are constantly being invented to be used in specific situations and locations. Some of them may evolve to be fully global, maybe trough a formal standardization process, but in lot of cases they remain local, or are reinterpreted (<span style="font-style: italic">translated</span>) when moved to different situations and cultural environments&#8230;.</p>
<p>A small test: what different type of garbage do you think you should throw in each container?, what  type of letters would you put in each mailbox? (try to answer the question without reading the small print in the photographs&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.albertsuch.com/blog/2007/08/01/color-coding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Standard wars in the Internet age</title>
		<link>http://www.albertsuch.com/blog/2007/02/01/standard-wars-in-the-internet-age/</link>
		<comments>http://www.albertsuch.com/blog/2007/02/01/standard-wars-in-the-internet-age/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 15:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>albert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[society and technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.albertsuch.com/blog/?p=6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Standard wars are, probably, one of the better studied cases in technology and innovation management textbooks. There is no serious book in these areas that does not cite the VHS vs. Beta case, as a paradigm of how non technical  issues play a key role in the evolution of technologies. This is a concept [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: arial">Standard wars are, probably, one of the better studied cases in technology and innovation management textbooks. There is no serious book in these areas that does not cite the VHS vs. Beta case, as a paradigm of how <span style="font-style: italic">non technical</span>  issues play a key role in the evolution of technologies. This is a concept that is, very often, difficult to assume by pure <span style="font-style: italic">techies </span>that think that the best technology, best using some quantifiable measure such as speed, image quality,&#8230;, is the one that should <span style="font-style: italic">win</span> regardless of the environment. Market, society, culture&#8230; are concepts that are easier to describe than to measure (and, consequently, predict), so they should not appear in the engineer&#8217;s drawing board.</span></p>
<p>But standard wars are here to stay, as one of the modes in which conflicts of interests around technology definition and evolution are deployed and, in most of the cases, closed, with <span style="font-style: italic">winners</span> and <span style="font-style: italic">losers.</span></p>
<p>And they are important: can anybody think that internet, as the <span style="font-style: italic">network of networks</span>, would have evolved to the Internet we know today if the ISO/OSI standards, and its underlying centralized model, had won over TCP/IP in the standards war over computer networking protocols in the 1980s?. Usually, there are high stakes in the game (benefit, control, power,&#8230;) and <span style="font-style: italic">the winner takes it all.</span></p>
<p>And that&#8217;s why standards wars are fought with all the <span style="font-style: italic">weapons</span> available, and in the Internet age, that means, of course, the Internet itself. Standard wars are as much about <span style="font-style: italic">perception</span> than technology, and Internet is, today, one of the best mechanisms to build or destroy perceptions.</p>
<p>One of the standards wars that is very active these days is the one over standards for document file formats. It has been going on for a couple of years now, with different contenders and fronts: <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic">Microsoft </span>with <a href="http://xml.openoffice.org/">Open Office XML (OOXML)</a> vs. <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic">IBM </span>and <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic">OASIS </span>with  <a href="http://www.odfalliance.org/">OpenDocument Format(ODF)</a> on the office document front; <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic">Microsoft  </span>with <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/xps/default.mspx">XML Paper Specification (XPS)</a> vs. <span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic">Adobe </span>with the <a href="http://www.adobe.com/devnet/pdf/pdf_reference.html">Portable Document Format (PDF)</a> on the fixed document front.</p>
<p>As in any standards war, different companies and interest groups are trying to push their standard as the one that better meets customer needs, which usually means the customer needs that can be met by their own standard. The difference is that, in this case, the battle is not only being fought in committee meetings, ballots over draft specs, or corporate alliances. Blogs and wikis have are the places where all the tricks (some of them clean, some of them dirty&#8230;) are being played, trying to change the perception of the different technologies at stake.</p>
<p>In this framework, the <a href="http://www.oreillynet.com/xml/blog/2007/01/an_interesting_offer.html">latest news</a> about Microsoft paying somebody to change the contents of the wikipedia article on OOXML to make it sound more positive, and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Office_Open_XML#Microsoft_askes_XML_expert_Rick_Jelliffe_for_adding_view_on_OOXML_wikipedia_articles">the reaction that it has caused</a> shows how, for good or for bad, Internet has become an important medium to influence the shaping of technology.</p>
<p>For some this may sound positive: more <span style="font-style: italic">democracy</span>  in the technology shaping process, while for others, it may sound really unsettling as more and more <span style="font-style: italic">non technical</span> issues will influence what gets designed and implemented. Welcome to the standards wars in the Internet age&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.albertsuch.com/blog/2007/02/01/standard-wars-in-the-internet-age/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
